20 verified patient reviews of Girin PS

The reviewer had revision double-eyelid surgery after a previous non-incisional result began to loosen on one side and look uneven in photos. They said the price was higher than expected and recovery was painful for several days, but the eyes became noticeably larger and the loosening was fixed; overall they were satisfied and strongly recommended the surgery.

The reviewer had revision double-eyelid surgery after a previous natural adhesion method began to partially fade and create asymmetry. Recovery was painful for several days, and the price was higher than expected, but the result made the eyes noticeably larger with no recurrence; they were satisfied and recommended the surgery for similar cases.

The reviewer had eye surgery to lower and reshape the outer corners of the eyes for a less upturned, less “sad” look. Recovery was mostly manageable: there was no real pain, but one-sided conjunctival swelling made opening the eye uncomfortable, and by two weeks they could resume daily life; at about six weeks, redness, firmness, and some pulling when smiling remained, with one eye still looking somewhat swollen or still elevated. They were generally satisfied and said the result seemed good, but they were disappointed not to have met the surgeon afterward and planned a follow-up.

The reviewer had eye-lowering surgery to make the eyes look less upturned, and they chose it after a friend’s strong recommendation. Recovery was mostly smooth: there was low discomfort, but they had morning discharge, one-sided conjunctival swelling, redness, stiffness, and a pulling sensation when smiling; by two weeks they could resume daily life, and at about 1.5 months the swelling was still not fully gone. They felt the result was promising and were generally satisfied, though they were still waiting for a follow-up and noted the parking support was limited.

The reviewer had eye surgery to create a softer eye shape and improve a multi-fold, sleepy-looking double eyelid, along with a procedure to shorten a long philtrum. They said recovery issues were not mentioned, and the result looked natural without mouth closure problems or an awkward appearance; they felt the proportions were well balanced and were very satisfied, recommending the outcome.

The reviewer had a philtrum-shortening procedure and a lateral canthoplasty-style eye adjustment to correct a long philtrum and improve the eye shape. Recovery details and cost were not mentioned, but the reviewer said the eyes became softer and the sleepy look was fixed, while the philtrum was reduced naturally without making the mouth hard to close or the face look unnatural. They felt well cared for, were very satisfied, and would recommend it.

The reviewer had eye surgery involving double eyelids and back/bottom canthoplasty, and also had a philtrum-shortening procedure. They said recovery and results went well, with no mouth-closing problems or awkwardness, and the eyes became softer and more balanced; they felt the outcome matched their facial proportions and strongly recommended it.

The reviewer had double-eyelid revision, lateral canthoplasty, and philtrum reduction to make the eyes look less crowded and shorten a long philtrum. Recovery details were not given, but they reported no problems with mouth closure or unnatural appearance, and said the eyes became softer and the double eyelids were corrected perfectly. They were very satisfied and would recommend the result.

The reviewer had revision double-eyelid surgery because a prior procedure had become uneven over 10 years. Recovery took about 2 weeks for the main swelling and bruising to improve, but they had significant bruising and swelling for the first 2–3 days and used cold compresses and ointment frequently; the surgery itself took about an hour and was not very painful, only tight and sore. They felt the consultation was thorough, were satisfied with the result so far, and would recommend it.

The reviewer had revision double-eyelid surgery to correct increasing asymmetry from a procedure done 10 years earlier. Recovery included strong bruising and swelling for 2–3 days, with pulling discomfort and throbbing at first, but by 2 weeks the line looked cleaner and others said the eyes looked bigger; the reviewer felt the operation was worth it and would recommend it.

The reviewer had breast augmentation with inframammary incisions and 330 cc Mentor Extra implants in both breasts. Recovery was easier than expected, with noticeable improvement by days 3, 5, and 7; she had swelling, upper fullness, and occasional tightness after heavy arm use, but no major complications. She felt happy with the result, said she would recommend it, and even recommended the surgery to others.

The reviewer had breast augmentation through an inframammary incision with Mentor Extra 330 implants placed on both sides. Recovery was faster and less painful than expected, with noticeable improvement by days 3, 5, and 7, though swelling, heaviness, and a temporary tight or stiff feeling remained; they said the result still looked slightly unnatural while swollen but expected it to settle well. Overall, they were very satisfied, regretted not doing it sooner, and recommended the surgery and provider.