DA PS

The reviewer had revision double-eyelid incision surgery with lateral and lower canthoplasty and ptosis correction. Recovery included swelling and bruising right after surgery, but these improved within about two weeks, and at one month the eyelid line looked clearer and more natural; the revision cost was high, and the long wait at the large hospital was a downside. They felt reassured by the detailed consultation and were overall very satisfied, saying they would recommend it.

The reviewer had revision double-eyelid incision surgery plus lower eyelid surgery and eye-area correction after previously having buried sutures. Recovery included swelling and bruising right after surgery, but these faded within about two weeks, and the eye shape continued to settle over the first month; the reviewer said the result looked natural and more open, though the revision cost was high and the wait time was long. Overall, they were very satisfied, felt the care was attentive, and would recommend it.

The reviewer had double eyelid surgery to address small, narrow-looking eyes with a lot of eyelid fat. They reported that the desired eyelid line was achieved, and even after the anesthesia wore off there was low discomfort; they also said parking was easy and staff were kind. They were very satisfied and would recommend it, noting that a friend asked where it was done after seeing the result.

The reviewer had double eyelid surgery to create a more open eye shape because their eyes looked small and cramped. They had a lot of eyelid fat but still achieved the desired line, and after the anesthesia wore off they had low discomfort; they were very satisfied and said acquaintances even asked where it was done, so they would recommend it.

The reviewer had rhinoplasty for a bulbous, low nose that had bothered them since childhood. They said the consultation was organized and hygienic, and recovery was fast enough to return to work after one week with swelling and bruising fading quickly; by one month the result looked natural and matched what they wanted. They reported no complications, felt very satisfied, and would recommend it.

The reviewer had nose surgery to correct a bulbous, low nose that had bothered them since childhood. They worried about cost, time, and pain, but recovery went well: swelling and bruising faded quickly, they returned to work after one week without coworkers noticing, and by one month they felt the result looked natural and matched their ideal. They were very satisfied and would recommend it.

The reviewer had double eyelid surgery with partial fat removal, eye correction, and epicanthoplasty. Recovery involved swelling and bruising right after surgery, but these improved over a few days, and the eyes looked clearer with a natural crease; they felt the procedure was careful and the aftercare was good. They were very satisfied overall and would recommend it, though the long wait time was a clear negative.

The reviewer had double eyelid buried sutures, partial fat removal, eye correction, and epicanthoplasty. They reported mild swelling and bruising right after surgery, with improvement over several days, and said the result looked natural and made the eyes appear clearer; however, the wait time was long despite expecting a walk-in visit. They were very satisfied with the careful consultation, surgery, and aftercare, and they would recommend it.

The patient had cheekbone reduction surgery after considering it for 10 years, and the consultation gave them confidence to proceed. Recovery and follow-up went smoothly, with no bruising and only swelling; by nearly 3 months, they were satisfied with the result. They felt the process was well organized and would recommend it.

The reviewer had jaw reduction surgery after wanting it for 10 years but feeling too scared to proceed until the consultation gave them confidence. Recovery from testing through postoperative follow-up went smoothly, and at nearly 3 months they were satisfied with the result; swelling occurred but there was no bruising. They felt very positive overall and would recommend the experience.

The reviewer had revision double-eyelid surgery with incision and eye correction after the original crease loosened, and they chose it because they wanted a natural line and needed surgery quickly. Recovery was about 3 months, with 1–2 hours of waiting on the visit, and they reported a short consultation, a double-line appearance at the inner eye, and red marks near the outer corner that were still being monitored. Overall, they were mostly satisfied and would likely recommend it, but they remained concerned about the lingering cosmetic issues.

The reviewer had a revision double-eyelid surgery with an incision-based eyelid correction after a previous buried-suture result came undone. Recovery was about three months, and the outcome was generally natural and satisfactory, but they reported a two-line mark in front of the eye and a red scar at the outer corner that was still being monitored; they also noted a long 1–2 hour wait and a short consultation. Overall, they were pleased and would likely recommend it, though they remained concerned about the slightly posterior incision line and lingering redness.